Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02716
Original file (BC 2010 02716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02716 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the 
Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was deployed to Kadena Air Base, Okinawa in support of 
military operations. He had no written orders, only verbal 
orders from the commander. On or about 1 February 1966, he was 
deployed to Takhli Air Base, Thailand for 33 days in support of 
King Cobra. On 10 March 1966, he redeployed to Kadena Air Base, 
Okinawa. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of photos; his DD Forms 214, Armed Forces of 
the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge; his DD Form 
215, Correction of DD Forms 214, Armed Forces of the United 
States Report of Transfer or Discharge; his AF Form 7, Airman 
Military Record, Certificate of Training, letters from the 
National Personnel Records Center and his squadron. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 11 February 
1959 and was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first 
class (E-3), having assumed that grade effective and with a date 
of rank of 1 February 1962. 

 

The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces 
who between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in the 
following areas of Southeast Asia: in Vietnam and the contiguous 
waters and airspace, in Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the 
airspace thereof and in the direct support of military 
operations in Vietnam. 

 


On 26 April 1966, the applicant was honorably discharged from 
the Air Force due to expiration of term of service. He served 
7 years, 2 months and 16 days of total active service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states there was no 
documentation in his military personnel records or provided to 
verify his temporary duty (TDY) assignment to Takhli Air Base, 
Thailand. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 September 2010 for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, this office has received no response 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant’s 
records were thoroughly reviewed, however, no documentation was 
found nor did he provide any evidence to substantiate his 
eligibility for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. In view of 
the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_______________________________________________________________
_ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-02716 in Executive Session on 28 October 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

Panel Chair 

Member 

Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jul 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 27 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02076

    Original file (BC-2010-02076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces who between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia: in Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace, in Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace thereof and in the direct support of military operations in Vietnam. After reviewing the available evidence, we believe the applicant has provided reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of his records. Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04635

    Original file (BC-2011-04635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. DPSIDR verified the applicant is entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with V device and one Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) and the Republic of Vietnam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00265

    Original file (BC-2011-00265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM. As such, with the exception of the KDSM award that will be administratively added to his records, he is not entitled to any additional awards for his service in Vietnam; therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582

    Original file (BC-2010-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02164

    Original file (BC-2011-02164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02164 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). There is no evidence of any time served in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01393

    Original file (BC 2014 01393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no official documentation in the applicant’s records to verify he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months for award of the VCM. In additional, the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments verified the applicant as having served at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, but they were unable to confirm any foreign-service in Vietnam; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. To be eligible, a service member must be: permanently assigned,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00621

    Original file (BC-2012-00621.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 27 days of active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part that a review of his Master Personnel Records (MPRs) and documentation submitted failed to reveal any documents that substantiate foreign service time in Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...